Android

The Pixel Watch may have had 1GB of RAM, 8GB of storage

The Google Pixel Watch (Review) was one of the crucial fashionable and anticipated units of 2022. The wearable launched with RAM and storage akin to the competitors. Nevertheless, it seems that Google didn’t initially intend for it to. In line with a brand new report, a Reddit user accidentally bought a prototype of the Pixel Watch, and the specs have been fairly stunning.

As we all know, the Google Pixel Watch launched with 2GB of RAM and 32GB of storage. Positive, which will sound like what you’d have gotten on a 2015 mid-range telephone, however that could be a lot for a contemporary smartwatch. This lends to the efficiency and the variety of apps you could obtain on the gadget.

Nevertheless, the Pixel Watch prototype had specs that weren’t fairly sturdy

A Reddit consumer ordered a Pixel Watch that had some excessive burning on the display screen, together with horrible efficiency and spotty charging. After they tried to reset the watch, the watch mentioned that it had “lower than meant Ram”, and requested in the event that they nonetheless needed to pair it.

Upon getting into the fastboot mode, the consumer noticed that this model had only 1GB of RAM and only 8GB of storage. That’s half the quantity of RAM that the Pixel Watch debuted with and a fourth of the storage. Within the publish, the consumer said that this was probably a rip-off or a knockoff. Nevertheless, it seems that this can be a prototype of the Pixel Watch.

Trying on the specs, it seems that, someplace alongside the road, Google deliberate on giving this watch very delicate specs. Whereas smartwatches usually have fairly modest specs, solely 1GB of RAM and 8GB of storage would have positively been a serious letdown.

That is very true as a result of it is likely one of the pricier smartwatches available on the market. The most affordable model of the Pixel Watch prices $349.99. If Google launched this watch at that worth with these specs, individuals wouldn’t have preferred that.

In any case, the consumer mentioned that they’d shelled out for a used Galaxy Watch 5. So, life goes on.


Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button